Navy

The defending Big XII Champions
KsJoey
Posts: 3578
Joined: October 4th, 2017, 10:21 am
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 549 times

Re: Navy

Post by KsJoey » December 9th, 2019, 9:00 am

We have the defense and players to match up well against Navy, IMO. Quality DEs, quick DBs. Only concern is we've had tackling issues at times. But I think this game of strengths will go in our favor. No way they're getting 300 yards on the ground.

hilltopwildcat
Posts: 4191
Joined: September 4th, 2013, 12:52 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Post by hilltopwildcat » December 9th, 2019, 9:27 am

KsJoey wrote:
December 9th, 2019, 9:00 am
We have the defense and players to match up well against Navy, IMO. Quality DEs, quick DBs. Only concern is we've had tackling issues at times. But I think this game of strengths will go in our favor. No way they're getting 300 yards on the ground.
I was also going to mention tackling. We'll need to make more tackles on the initial contact and quit tackling shoulder pads.

User avatar
PurpleWildcat
Posts: 476
Joined: November 8th, 2017, 3:47 pm
Location: Frederick, CO
Has thanked: 163 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Pick 'Em

Post by PurpleWildcat » December 9th, 2019, 10:49 am

We know that Navy is going to be very disciplined and probably won't be doing a lot of trash talking. I wonder if that will actually help calm our guys down and not get so many of the stupid personal foul calls they have gotten for celebrating. Hopefully it will help them focus more and not celebrate so much after every play made (Lance Robinson), routine or not. Maybe that's just me being and old fart, but it does get old.

With the way our corners have played this year, even the backups, I think we will be able to load up against the run and not have so many in coverage. With both AJ Parker and Walter Neil going down, I have been impressed with the backups. Yes, Robinson celebrates too much after every one of his plays, but dang he has been good.

Yes, it would be nice to be at a bigger name bowl, but at the beginning of the season I bet most of us would have thought this was the best bowl we could get to. I think this is a great match up and I can't wait.

farrout10
Posts: 581
Joined: December 13th, 2018, 3:40 pm
Has thanked: 340 times
Been thanked: 249 times

Post by farrout10 » December 9th, 2019, 11:07 am

Bowls rated 1-38 by CBS
10. Liberty Bowl -- No. 23 Navy vs. Kansas State -- Dec. 31, 3:45 p.m.: I'll understand if this game isn't everybody's cup of team, but I'm all about it. What we have here is an option team in Navy going against a Kansas State team that doesn't run the option, but runs the ball almost as often as an option team. The clock is never going to stop. It's going to be physical. The players will be sore when it's done. I'm going to love every minute. BS

AJcat7755
Posts: 6462
Joined: February 26th, 2014, 11:29 am
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 973 times

Pick 'Em

Post by AJcat7755 » December 9th, 2019, 1:18 pm

One thing that needs to be pointed out is that service academies require their players to maintain a certain height to weight proportions as part of their future service. While during the football season, the requirements are relaxed a bit, it still limits the type of players they can recruit. In addition, after their season, most of the players have to cut a lot of weight, specifically on the line, in a few months before graduation in order to be eligible for service, which results in them starting to cut around bowl time. This is part of why they run a unique offense, because they have smaller, and more agile, OL.

This will be a game where KSU is not facing a team that is significantly bigger on the lines. The question is if KSU is athletic enough to keep up with the triple option.

Ken Niumatalolo is 5-5 in bowl games:
2007 - Lost to Utah (8-4). Navy was (8-5)
2008 - Lost to Wake Forest (7-5). Navy was (8-5)
2009 - Beat Missouri (8-4). Navy was (10-4)
2010 - Lost to San Diego State (8-4). Navy was (9-4)
2012 - Lost to Arizona State (7-5). Navy was (8-5)
2013 - Beat Middle Tennessee (8-4). Navy was (9-4)
2014 - Beat San Diego State (7-5). Navy was (8-5)
2015 - Beat Pittsburgh (8-4). Navy was (11-2)

2016 - Lost to Louisiana Tech (8-5). Navy was (9-5)
2017 - Beat Virginia (6-6). Navy was (7-6)

User avatar
stlcatfan
Posts: 6911
Joined: September 9th, 2017, 7:45 am
Has thanked: 11751 times
Been thanked: 2171 times

Post by stlcatfan » December 9th, 2019, 3:46 pm

I wonder how much of an asset Coach Norwood will be to Navy since he coached at K-State last season. Of course, I wondered the same with Miss. State and TCU with their K-State transfers and we seemed to come out okay.
"Don't believe everything you read on the Internet." -- Abraham Lincoln

tmcats
Posts: 23689
Joined: September 3rd, 2013, 1:09 pm
Has thanked: 3385 times
Been thanked: 6155 times

Pick 'Em

Post by tmcats » December 9th, 2019, 3:48 pm

this will be a quick game.
Why is there something rather than nothing?

wild@nite
Posts: 7477
Joined: February 28th, 2018, 1:35 pm
Has thanked: 467 times
Been thanked: 2187 times

Pick 'Em

Post by wild@nite » December 9th, 2019, 6:03 pm

stlcatfan wrote:
December 9th, 2019, 3:46 pm
I wonder how much of an asset Coach Norwood will be to Navy since he coached at K-State last season. Of course, I wondered the same with Miss. State and TCU with their K-State transfers and we seemed to come out okay.
Completely different staff, so I'm guessing that takes away any asset he would be. Not sure what we do that we did when he was here. Different blocking schemes, different offensive language, completely different defense.

Tbonespop
Posts: 3971
Joined: September 2nd, 2013, 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 1185 times
Been thanked: 1458 times

Post by Tbonespop » December 9th, 2019, 7:34 pm

stlcatfan wrote:
December 9th, 2019, 3:46 pm
I wonder how much of an asset Coach Norwood will be to Navy since he coached at K-State last season. Of course, I wondered the same with Miss. State and TCU with their K-State transfers and we seemed to come out okay.
Its interesting, we beat every team we played that PLAYERS transferred to, but we lost to every team on the schedule the previous COACHES changed to. I don't see Texas getting much of anything on us to help them, but I could definitely see WVU and OSU having a leg up on us with the coaches they got from us. They knew several of our linemen extremely well, and I could see that benefiting them. Of note, Coach Malone helped us out for sure against MSU. So there may be something to the former coaches having an influence, but not likely from the players.
EMAW

User avatar
stlcatfan
Posts: 6911
Joined: September 9th, 2017, 7:45 am
Has thanked: 11751 times
Been thanked: 2171 times

Post by stlcatfan » December 9th, 2019, 7:59 pm

Tbonespop wrote:
December 9th, 2019, 7:34 pm
stlcatfan wrote:
December 9th, 2019, 3:46 pm
I wonder how much of an asset Coach Norwood will be to Navy since he coached at K-State last season. Of course, I wondered the same with Miss. State and TCU with their K-State transfers and we seemed to come out okay.
Its interesting, we beat every team we played that PLAYERS transferred to, but we lost to every team on the schedule the previous COACHES changed to. I don't see Texas getting much of anything on us to help them, but I could definitely see WVU and OSU having a leg up on us with the coaches they got from us. They knew several of our linemen extremely well, and I could see that benefiting them. Of note, Coach Malone helped us out for sure against MSU. So there may be something to the former coaches having an influence, but not likely from the players.
That's a good point. I was thinking Coach Norwood has a good knowledge of many of our players strengths and weaknesses from having coached here. I'm sure he will be (like Coach Malone was in the MSU game) an asset to Navy's game prep for us.
"Don't believe everything you read on the Internet." -- Abraham Lincoln

Post Reply