How many ....
-
- Posts: 6462
- Joined: February 26th, 2014, 11:29 am
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 973 times
Re: How many ....
I for one would rather be 10-2 and get blown out in a bigger name bowl then to be 8-4 and beat a middle tier P5 team, or even a G5 team, in a lower tier bowl. Despite the loss, just appearing in a bigger bowl is worth the publicity, can be used in recruiting, and would also mean finishing 3rd in the Big 12 outright.
-
- Posts: 23624
- Joined: September 3rd, 2013, 1:09 pm
- Has thanked: 3374 times
- Been thanked: 6098 times
yeah, that wvu lose went deeper than just that game.
Why is there something rather than nothing?
-
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: September 21st, 2017, 6:28 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Frankly, after the Baylor loss, I was not certain the team would win another game. This team has been fairly unpredictable which has in part made the season so much fun. I have appreciated all the effort from players, coaches, etc.. I have no idea what's going to happen in a bowl game. It would be so cool if they played Notre Dame. Won't happen, but you can dream.
-
- Posts: 11759
- Joined: September 19th, 2017, 8:22 am
- Has thanked: 1347 times
- Been thanked: 1222 times
I guess I'm a lot more sensitive to the oft-repeated line 'over-rated' and 'cupcake schedule' which you know gets trotted out, recycled every time.AJcat7755 wrote: ↑December 4th, 2019, 12:08 pmI for one would rather be 10-2 and get blown out in a bigger name bowl then to be 8-4 and beat a middle tier P5 team, or even a G5 team, in a lower tier bowl. Despite the loss, just appearing in a bigger bowl is worth the publicity, can be used in recruiting, and would also mean finishing 3rd in the Big 12 outright.
never thought that helped recruiting or 'presence on the national stage' at all.
If you have to be persuaded, reminded, pressured, lied to, incentivized, coerced, bullied, socially shamed, guilt-tripped, threatened, punished and criminalized...you can be absolutely certain that what is being promoted is not in your best interest
-
- Posts: 6462
- Joined: February 26th, 2014, 11:29 am
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 973 times
OU gets beat in every big game they play in, but they get to play in the big games. Would they rather make the playoffs and lose, or not make the playoffs at all?KITNooga wrote: ↑December 4th, 2019, 4:21 pmI guess I'm a lot more sensitive to the oft-repeated line 'over-rated' and 'cupcake schedule' which you know gets trotted out, recycled every time.AJcat7755 wrote: ↑December 4th, 2019, 12:08 pmI for one would rather be 10-2 and get blown out in a bigger name bowl then to be 8-4 and beat a middle tier P5 team, or even a G5 team, in a lower tier bowl. Despite the loss, just appearing in a bigger bowl is worth the publicity, can be used in recruiting, and would also mean finishing 3rd in the Big 12 outright.
never thought that helped recruiting or 'presence on the national stage' at all.
Which do you think helps a program more, going 8-5 and winning the Buffalo Wild Wings Bowl, or going 10-3 and losing in the Cotton Bowl?
If you look back at the history of a program, do you remember the 7-8 win seasons where there was a bowl win in the Cactus Bowl, Texas Bowl, BWW Bowl, or do you remember the Fiesta Bowl losses and the great season that came before the bowl?
Lower tier bowls are meaningless, generate very little buzz nationally, and are quickly forgotten in years later win or lose. But for the time the game is played, which opponents would generate more publicity, win or lose?
Being guaranteed 3rd in the Big 12 at 10-2 would mean playing in the Alamo or Camping World Bowl (dependent on what the top 2 end up) against: USC, Notre Dame, Utah, Oregon. Instead, with the 4 teams tied, KSU could be bumped down a bowl and play in the Texas, Liberty or Cheez It Bowl against: Mississippi State, Cincinnati, Toledo, Kentucky, Texas A&M, SMU, Air Force, Navy. Which do you think will generate more viewers?
Right now, with the tie breakers, its up to the bowls to pick who they want. I would much rather play in that first group, in a bowl higher up, even if there is a greater risk of losing.
-
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: September 21st, 2017, 6:28 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
I clearly remember KSU beating Michigan and Texas A&M in lesser bowls. The Michigan fans at work remember that game and Tyler Lockett. Both have their pluses. Would have been nice to beat Ohio State and/or Oregon. I remember the 1993 bowl game against Wyoming as do probably 100,000 wildcat fans.AJcat7755 wrote: ↑December 4th, 2019, 5:00 pmOU gets beat in every big game they play in, but they get to play in the big games. Would they rather make the playoffs and lose, or not make the playoffs at all?
Which do you think helps a program more, going 8-5 and winning the Buffalo Wild Wings Bowl, or going 10-3 and losing in the Cotton Bowl?
If you look back at the history of a program, do you remember the 7-8 win seasons where there was a bowl win in the Cactus Bowl, Texas Bowl, BWW Bowl, or do you remember the Fiesta Bowl losses and the great season that came before the bowl?
Lower tier bowls are meaningless, generate very little buzz nationally, and are quickly forgotten in years later win or lose. But for the time the game is played, which opponents would generate more publicity, win or lose?
Being guaranteed 3rd in the Big 12 at 10-2 would mean playing in the Alamo or Camping World Bowl (dependent on what the top 2 end up) against: USC, Notre Dame, Utah, Oregon. Instead, with the 4 teams tied, KSU could be bumped down a bowl and play in the Texas, Liberty or Cheez It Bowl against: Mississippi State, Cincinnati, Toledo, Kentucky, Texas A&M, SMU, Air Force, Navy. Which do you think will generate more viewers?
Right now, with the tie breakers, its up to the bowls to pick who they want. I would much rather play in that first group, in a bowl higher up, even if there is a greater risk of losing.
Losing stinks big time whether it is a big or small bowl and it definitely leaves a bad taste at the end of the season. But, hey, there's always next season!
-
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: September 1st, 2018, 6:52 pm
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 148 times
I for one don’t really like watching my team getting boat raced like we did against Oregon that one year when we had a lofty record. Beating a solid team on a lesser bowl is much more likely going to bring positive press vs. being overrated and embarrassed on notational tv.
-
- Posts: 1729
- Joined: September 4th, 2013, 8:42 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Well, I clearly remember Michael Bishop passing for 4 TD's in the Fiesta Bowl against Syracuse. Really stole the thunder away from Donovan McNabb on that New Year's Eve.
-
- Posts: 1729
- Joined: September 4th, 2013, 8:42 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Last year, Texas defeated No.5 rated Georgia in the Sugar Bowl. "Texas is back", became their battle cry going into this year. Then they struggled to a mediocre 7-5 record.
-
- Posts: 326
- Joined: April 17th, 2019, 9:20 am
- Location: Missouri, Iowa, Kansas
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
I’m a believer that things even out between close wins (Miss State, TCU, Tech) and close losses (WV, TX) and most teams are basically what the record indicates. Eight wins in modern parity driven college football is a wonderful season. Winning a bowl is nice but not a must for a successful season. Looking at the KSU schedule next season three automatic W’s unless Vanderbilt is radically improved and a favorable home schedule, plus snare a road win and you got another 8 or 9 win season and a ton of momentum. Good feelings abound