K-State vs. WVU
-
- Posts: 23634
- Joined: September 3rd, 2013, 1:09 pm
- Has thanked: 3374 times
- Been thanked: 6109 times
Initially, the refs didn't see the hit. CK asked for and received a review by the upstairs officials. the player was then ejected for targeting.
Why is there something rather than nothing?
-
- Posts: 11759
- Joined: September 19th, 2017, 8:22 am
- Has thanked: 1347 times
- Been thanked: 1222 times
that's a dirtier play than the palomalu hit
there are plays that happen at game speed. then stuff like this.
might be intersting to see this as a play control foul and the penalty (missed game time) is minimum one game suspension and in the case on longer term 'victim' being unable to play, extended to match.
that was factually, felonious assault.
there are plays that happen at game speed. then stuff like this.
might be intersting to see this as a play control foul and the penalty (missed game time) is minimum one game suspension and in the case on longer term 'victim' being unable to play, extended to match.
that was factually, felonious assault.
If you have to be persuaded, reminded, pressured, lied to, incentivized, coerced, bullied, socially shamed, guilt-tripped, threatened, punished and criminalized...you can be absolutely certain that what is being promoted is not in your best interest
As soon as I saw the hit, I thought "oh he's gone". Did not think that HCCK would have to ask for a review of something so blatant.
We don’t see things as they are; we see them as we are. - Anaïs Nin
-
- Posts: 3578
- Joined: October 4th, 2017, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 57 times
- Been thanked: 549 times
If he would have hit Gill in the chest and knocked him down, 15yd penalty for unnecessary roughness. But giving him a blow to the head is pretty blatant Targeting, and he was ejected as well. The refs got it right, even though they had to review it to get it right.
I wish there were 2 levels of Targeting. 1st level carrying an ejection and 1 game suspension for bam bam type plays, which covers a vast majority of targeting calls. And a level 2, which carries an ejection and 3 game suspension for blatant targeting(like against Gill). College football needs to take players like Jaylen Green out of the game for more than 4 quarters. Heck, Gill will be out at least that
I wish there were 2 levels of Targeting. 1st level carrying an ejection and 1 game suspension for bam bam type plays, which covers a vast majority of targeting calls. And a level 2, which carries an ejection and 3 game suspension for blatant targeting(like against Gill). College football needs to take players like Jaylen Green out of the game for more than 4 quarters. Heck, Gill will be out at least that
-
- Posts: 1729
- Joined: September 4th, 2013, 8:42 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
There's a ref standing literally 10 feet away looking in the direction of that cheap shot. Why the hell didn't he throw a flag? If not for the booth review that POS would have got away with battery.
I have always thought that civil suits or assault charges need to happen more often in sports cases like this. Sport should not give you a pass.
-
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: September 8th, 2017, 10:36 am
- Has thanked: 977 times
- Been thanked: 757 times
CK said that he didn’t think the punishment was adequate. Here’s my proposal: the afflicted team (KState in this case) is allowed to pick any player from the opposing team to be ejected, in addition to the perpetrator. This would cure some of this thuggery.
-
- Posts: 6462
- Joined: February 26th, 2014, 11:29 am
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 973 times
Easy pick, the QB almost every time. Teams have backups at other positions with experience, but the backup QB usually has the least amount of experience.PurpleOnWhite wrote: ↑November 13th, 2019, 5:49 pmCK said that he didn’t think the punishment was adequate. Here’s my proposal: the afflicted team (KState in this case) is allowed to pick any player from the opposing team to be ejected, in addition to the perpetrator. This would cure some of this thuggery.
-
- Posts: 7458
- Joined: February 28th, 2018, 1:35 pm
- Has thanked: 466 times
- Been thanked: 2170 times
So punishing an innocent player for another players dumb play is your answer? Seems ridiculous. Why not just punish the guilty party more harshly as opposed to punishing an innocent player? I don't really get this line of thinking at all.PurpleOnWhite wrote: ↑November 13th, 2019, 5:49 pmCK said that he didn’t think the punishment was adequate. Here’s my proposal: the afflicted team (KState in this case) is allowed to pick any player from the opposing team to be ejected, in addition to the perpetrator. This would cure some of this thuggery.