The NCAA to speed up investigation of major infractions cases

COTY Jerome Tang and his 2023 Elite Eight Cats
tmcats
Posts: 23634
Joined: September 3rd, 2013, 1:09 pm
Has thanked: 3374 times
Been thanked: 6109 times

Pick 'Em

The NCAA to speed up investigation of major infractions cases

Post by tmcats » August 6th, 2021, 3:45 pm

The NCAA is changing the way it handles major infractions cases being adjudicated by the independent accountability resolution process (IARP) in an attempt to speed up what has been a protracted process so far.

Launched in August 2019, the IARP has yet to fully adjudicate a school case.

On Wednesday, the Division I board of directors approved immediate changes that will allow the IARP's complex case unit to accept the investigative work of the NCAA's enforcement staff "unless the unit can demonstrate a compelling reason why additional investigation is required."

The independent accountability oversight committee recommended the changes, according to an NCAA release.

"The oversight committee, which has expressed concerns about the delay in the resolution of cases referred to the independent process, determined that much of the delay is the result of efforts by the Complex Case Unit to 're-investigate' cases that the enforcement staff thoroughly investigated," an NCAA release said. "Accepting the enforcement staff's results will speed the process significantly without compromising the goals of the Independent Accountability Resolution Process, committee members think."

An infractions case involving former Memphis basketball star James Wiseman was the first case accepted by the IARP on March 4, 2020. Five other cases related to a federal investigation into bribes and other corruption in college basketball, involving NC State, Louisville, Kansas, LSU and Arizona, also were accepted by the IARP over the next year.

NC State is the only case related to the federal investigation that has a hearing scheduled before the independent resolution panel (IRP), which will decide whether violations occurred and what penalties, if any, will be imposed. The IRP's decision is final and there are no appeals.

The Division I board of directors also voted to allow case timelines to be developed and published for each IARP case to "provide transparency and improve credibility."

SEC commissioner Greg Sankey is among those who have criticized the NCAA for not producing more timely results through the IARP. At SEC media days last month, he told reporters: "Those accused of violations deserve a fair and timely outcome, and those who compete against those accused of violations deserve that same fair and timely outcome."

Cases involving Arizona, Kansas, Louisville and NC State had been thoroughly investigated by NCAA enforcement staff and resulted in detailed notices of allegations. That wasn't the case with LSU, according to records released to ESPN by the university last week.


The case involving the LSU men's basketball program includes "alleged violations [involving] at least 13 prospective student athletes and a projected 75 individuals who may have knowledge of, and/or involvement in, the alleged violations in this case," according to a letter from external investigator Nicole Lamb-Hale and LSU compliance director Bo Bahnsen. They noted that enforcement staff had interviewed only 18 people before the case was referred to the IARP.

"The scope and scale of this investigation are broad and include allegations of significant infractions of NCAA bylaws many of which allegedly occurred in 2017 and 2018 and, as such, are based upon stale or incomplete facts that must be validated by CCU," Lamb-Hale and Bahnsen wrote in the Dec. 18 letter.

According to the documents, the complex case unit was scheduled to complete its LSU investigation by July 31 and then issue a notice of allegations within 60 days.
Why is there something rather than nothing?

IStillLikeHarv
Posts: 1714
Joined: March 9th, 2016, 9:25 pm
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Post by IStillLikeHarv » August 6th, 2021, 4:41 pm

Speed it up? Speed it up! Heck, they're already moving at breakneck speed.

;-)
These users thanked the author IStillLikeHarv for the post:
stlcatfan

PurpleOnWhite
Posts: 2454
Joined: September 8th, 2017, 10:36 am
Has thanked: 977 times
Been thanked: 757 times

Pick 'Em

Post by PurpleOnWhite » August 6th, 2021, 5:14 pm

This is laughable.

xtrawildcat
Posts: 11631
Joined: February 15th, 2016, 10:41 pm
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 1165 times

Post by xtrawildcat » August 6th, 2021, 6:14 pm

Thanks for posting that news. And we can all agree it is a bit laughable. But someday, they'll render a verdict. Maybe.

wazucat
Posts: 4154
Joined: September 1st, 2013, 7:01 pm
Location: Washington
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 743 times

Post by wazucat » August 7th, 2021, 1:12 pm

Wake me up when the Sqwauks get anything more than a slap on the wrist LOL.
These users thanked the author wazucat for the post (total 2):
stlcatfanWildcat7073

tmcats
Posts: 23634
Joined: September 3rd, 2013, 1:09 pm
Has thanked: 3374 times
Been thanked: 6109 times

Pick 'Em

Post by tmcats » September 29th, 2021, 1:28 pm

Amy Hanna, a spokesperson for the NCAA’s Independent Accountability Resolutions Process, told the Journal-World on Wednesday that updates for the infractions cases currently being reviewed by the IARP would be available “early next week.”

Hanna said the IARP was currently completing the procedural case timelines for all cases moving through the independent process and that the updates would be posted to the IARP website.

The NCAA’s case against the University of Kansas men’s basketball program, which includes allegations of five Level 1 infractions, a charge of head coach responsibility and a tag of lack of institutional control, is one of six cases currently being reviewed by the IARP.


http://www2.kusports.com/news/2021/sep/ ... ected-be-/
Why is there something rather than nothing?

tmcats
Posts: 23634
Joined: September 3rd, 2013, 1:09 pm
Has thanked: 3374 times
Been thanked: 6109 times

Pick 'Em

Post by tmcats » September 29th, 2021, 3:15 pm

ku fans' take on the matter is always instructive.

https://247sports.com/college/kansas/bo ... 80/?page=1
Why is there something rather than nothing?

bhoovy
Posts: 8842
Joined: November 9th, 2013, 10:50 pm
Has thanked: 395 times
Been thanked: 2400 times

Pick 'Em

Post by bhoovy » September 29th, 2021, 3:19 pm

But then they’re just going to appeal it and any punishment will get pushed back until after the appeal, which will be a few years down the road, right?
These users thanked the author bhoovy for the post (total 2):
stlcatfanrandallcat85

tmcats
Posts: 23634
Joined: September 3rd, 2013, 1:09 pm
Has thanked: 3374 times
Been thanked: 6109 times

Pick 'Em

Post by tmcats » September 29th, 2021, 6:44 pm

there is no appeal process in this method. ku's out would be federal court.
These users thanked the author tmcats for the post:
AlabamaLane
Why is there something rather than nothing?

katlander
Posts: 12692
Joined: June 3rd, 2015, 12:44 pm
Has thanked: 646 times
Been thanked: 2201 times

Pick 'Em

Post by katlander » September 29th, 2021, 8:37 pm

Thank God there is no corruption here. Is everybody for sale these days and can any crime be overlooked with sufficient lucre.
These users thanked the author katlander for the post:
randallcat85

Post Reply